admin

Ex-CJI UU Lalit Criticises New Penal Law BNS for Not Making Rape a Gender-Neutral Offence

Ex-CJI UU Lalit Criticises New Penal Law BNS for Not Making Rape a Gender-Neutral Offence   Former Chief Justice of India U.U. Lalit has sharply criticised the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) for failing to make the law on rape gender-neutral. He expressed serious concern that adult male victims of sexual assault remain without remedy, leaving

Ex-CJI UU Lalit Criticises New Penal Law BNS for Not Making Rape a Gender-Neutral Offence Read More »

On the auspicious occasion of your birthday, I extend my warmest greetings and heartiest wishes

Shri Narendra Modi Ji Hon’ble Prime Minister of India South Block, Raisina Hill New Delhi – 110011 Government of India Respected Shri Narendra Modi Ji, On the auspicious occasion of your birthday, I extend my warmest greetings and heartiest wishes. May the Almighty bless you with a long, healthy, and prosperous life dedicated to the

On the auspicious occasion of your birthday, I extend my warmest greetings and heartiest wishes Read More »

FIR Must Be Registered if Cognizable Offence Made Out; Alternative Remedy Not Absolute Bar to HC Jurisdiction; Investigators Too Can Be Investigated: SC

FIR Must Be Registered if Cognizable Offence Made Out; Alternative Remedy Not Absolute Bar to HC Jurisdiction; Investigators Too Can Be Investigated: SC Read more: https://lawtrend.in/fir-must-be-registered-if-cognizable-offence-made-out-alternative-remedy-not-absolute-bar-to-hc-jurisdiction-investigators-too-can-be-investigated-sc/ Supreme Court Landmark Ruling – FIR Registration Mandatory   The Supreme Court of India has upheld the Delhi High Court’s direction for mandatory FIR registration when a cognizable offence

FIR Must Be Registered if Cognizable Offence Made Out; Alternative Remedy Not Absolute Bar to HC Jurisdiction; Investigators Too Can Be Investigated: SC Read More »

Supreme Court Clarification on Quashing of FIR/Chargesheet under Article 226

Supreme Court Clarification on Quashing of FIR/Chargesheet under Article 226 New Delhi, September 3, 2025 The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has clarified an important aspect of criminal jurisprudence regarding the scope of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Court held that: A writ petition under Article 226 may be

Supreme Court Clarification on Quashing of FIR/Chargesheet under Article 226 Read More »

Custodial Deaths Across India – The Unnoticed Crisis

Custodial Deaths Across India – The Unnoticed Crisis   Custodial deaths represent one of the gravest assaults on human rights and the dignity of life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Yet, despite repeated judicial interventions, parliamentary debates, and recommendations by the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), this disturbing trend continues largely

Custodial Deaths Across India – The Unnoticed Crisis Read More »

Dr. Anthony Raju – Advocate, Supreme Court of India Leading Criminal Law Expert | POCSO Specialist | Human Rights Defender

Dr. Anthony Raju – Advocate, Supreme Court of India   Leading Criminal Law Expert | POCSO Specialist | Human Rights Defender     Legal Expertise and Practice   Dr. Anthony Raju is a highly respected Advocate of the Supreme Court of India and a leading authority in criminal and constitutional law, widely recognized for his

Dr. Anthony Raju – Advocate, Supreme Court of India Leading Criminal Law Expert | POCSO Specialist | Human Rights Defender Read More »

लाखों निर्दोष विचाराधीन कैदी जेल में – जिम्मेदार कौन?

लाखों निर्दोष विचाराधीन कैदी जेल में – जिम्मेदार कौन? डॉ. एंथोनी राजू, अधिवक्ता सर्वोच्च न्यायालय एवं चेयरमैन – अखिल भारतीय मानवाधिकार, स्वतंत्रता एवं सामाजिक न्याय परिषद भारत अपने संविधान और न्याय व्यवस्था पर गर्व करता है, लेकिन एक कड़वी सच्चाई यह है कि आज भी देश की जेलों में दो-तिहाई से अधिक कैदी विचाराधीन (Undertrial)

लाखों निर्दोष विचाराधीन कैदी जेल में – जिम्मेदार कौन? Read More »

SUPREME COURT LANDMARK JUDGMENT (2025) “Victim’s Credible Testimony Alone Is Sufficient for Conviction in Rape Cases — Even Without External Injuries or Medical Evidence”

SUPREME COURT LANDMARK JUDGMENT (2025) “Victim’s Credible Testimony Alone Is Sufficient for Conviction in Rape Cases — Even Without External Injuries or Medical Evidence” Case Summary: In [State vs. Accused – Name Withheld], the Supreme Court of India upheld the conviction of a man accused of sexually assaulting a 15-year-old girl. The accused challenged his

SUPREME COURT LANDMARK JUDGMENT (2025) “Victim’s Credible Testimony Alone Is Sufficient for Conviction in Rape Cases — Even Without External Injuries or Medical Evidence” Read More »